A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
✓Claimant Dairo Castellanos Forero·Respondent Ley 1176 De 2007
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se declara nulidad de la sentencia por desconocer regla jurisprudencial según la cual la idoneidad del recurso judicial debe evaluarse en el caso concreto y, por resultar violatoria del derecho fundamental al debido proceso
- Se confirma en su integridad el auto recurrido
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto en el término concedido al actor para corregirla transcurrió en silencio y el escrito de corrección se presentó de manera extemporánea.
La Sala Plena CONFIRMA el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del dieciseis (16) de febrero de 2015, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Dairo Castellanos Forero, en contra de los articulos 3o (parcial) y 5o de la Ley 1176 de 2007.
- SEGUNDO. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.